Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Manu last won the day on October 7

Manu had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

143 Excellent

1 Follower

About Manu

  • Rank
    Please don't read this, it's private.
  • Birthday 06/28/1986

Personal Information

  • Pronouns
  • Discord

Writing Related

  • Beta Reader?

Recent Profile Visitors

642 profile views
  1. I'm aware it's been a while since this topic was started, but my experience with traditional publishing in Germany is that especially for a debut novel shorter is actually better. Literary agencies and publishers over here work with page count instead of word count, and debut novels in a range of 200-400 pages are usually fine (one page can have a maximum of 1800 characters including spaces, and at the literary acency I work for we usually estimate page count by dividing the character count by 1700 or 1750 - and we definitely cheat if a novel falls on the shorter or longer end of the ideal range, 'coz once a publisher is hooked by the story, they won't reject it solely because it's 10 pages shorter or longer than they hoped for). Can't say for sure that those rules also apply for other countries, but I can't imagine the publishing industry in the US works completely different from the one I know - longer novels cost more to produce, so especially with debut novels, publishers lose less money if a novel doesn't sell if it's a shorter one, so they actually prefer the shorter ones in the case of unknown authors.
  2. That is exactly how I feel about it as well. Discord chat in some of the channels moves too fast for me to follow it, and it's extremely unconvenient to scroll back searching for the beginning of a discussion. That's why I've given up on using the Discord. I haven't been very active on the forum either recently, but especially for casually active members like me, I think forum discussions are easier to track back than Discord discussions are. Discord is great for real-time chatter and getting quick answers or reactions, but it's not ideal for in-depth discussions in my opinion, especially if so many different time zones are involved like it's the case with this community. That being said, if most of the community has already migrated to Discord, there's not much anyone can do to enforce forum activity.
  3. No idea yet. I'd love to do NaNo, but haven't written anything for several months. Maybe I'll finally start drafting that urban fantasy project I plotted like... two years ago 😛
  4. *looks at her own desk* Oh, the clutter thing resonates with me 😄 Priming is a good cue - I never really needed it to get creative before, but reading your lines about priming, I realized that I do most of my dayjob editing on the same laptop and at the same desk that I use for writing ('coz I'm in home office 4 days a week). I might have accidentally primed myself the wrong way - oops. It never occured to me before even though it's so obvious - my brain probably thinks it's time to edit and critique whenever I sit down at my desk. That was a real eye opener, thanks a lot!
  5. That is the meaning of the scandinavian suffixes -son and -dottir. The German "von" (it's not capitalized) was used to indicate the country estate or regional provenance of a person, it doesn't mean "son of X", it's literally a geographic "from" - like "John from London".
  6. That's also the approach I tend to use - I pick a language or culture, browse lists of typical names and write down those that I like to create a smaller list of my favorites. When I name characters, I go to that list and pick a name that seems to fit the character. I'm curious why you think that approach makes it neccessary to put more effort into researching the actual culture you're drawing inspiration from - after all, there are tons of fantasy books and movies that use old English or Irish names and don't give a damn about their medieval-ish fantasy world actually resembling what history books say.
  7. Hi everyone, I haven't been writing regularly for more than a half year, and I'm blaming the editing I'm doing in my dayjob - it makes my brain go to analyze+critique mode, and it's very hard for me to switch back to creative mode. Sure, the seemingly easy solution is "simply write before you start working", and I'm going to try that, but being a night owl and having tried it and failed before, I'd like to explore other options as well. What do you do to silence your inner critic? How do you tell that analytical part of your brain to take a break? Do you have any methods to "activate" your inner creative self, to get yourself into writing mood?
  8. Glad to read that you decided to keep going! Anyway, a little encouragement can never hurt, so I'm going to post what I was about to post anyway 🙂 While I get the frustration of playing in someone else's sandbox and having to do so much research to get all the facts right, I think you might be running into perfectionism issues nevertheless - there's absolutely no need to get everything right in the first draft, and it's totally fine to add a note to yourself, skip a description you can't write down without further research, and fill it in while you're editing. Keep going! And since "running into a block at chapter 19 of ~30" heavily reminded me of it, I'm going to post a Neil Gaiman NaNo peptalk from 2007:
  9. Manu

    Micro Arcs

    Oh, I as a reader, I love those little details that tie scenes together or reference previous scenes! I don't use them consciously in my own writing - probably I should put more conscious effort in little details like this! Earlier decisions backfiring on characters is something I have done a couple of times - I guess that would count as a micro arc 🙂 @Banespawn How do you implement micro arcs? Do they just come to you as random inspiration during drafting? Do you plan them in advance? Do you add them in during editing?
  10. I've been there, several times (and I'm in a similar situation even right now). I guess like with almost everything when it comes to writing, it boils down to finding out what works for you. For quite a long time, I felt so empty inside that I couldn't think of anything worth writing down, my creativity was completely gone and even thinking about writing goals made me more depressed because it made me feel like a failure. Looking back, I was severely depressed during that time, and not writing was the right thing to do back then - setting even mininal writing goals would have just been additional pressure at the time, and deciding to pause writing for a while was what felt right. I've also had phases of depression that weren't quite as severe, and writing actually helped during those times - a goal was what I needed at that time to keep me going. I never worked towards wordcount goals except for NaNoWriMo, I'd rather set myself a goal like "work on my WIPs for at least 30 minutes a day" - which could be anything from brainstorming, to plotting, worldbuilding, writing or editing. I've read a blog post (that I can't find anymore, by an author I don't remember...) that dealt with writing and depression. The author said that what worked for her was setting a minimal wordcount goal of 200 words per day - and that goal wasn't just about writing, it was more about fighting depression, because those 200 words every day were proof to herself that she was stronger than depression, and that depression could make writing harder, but depression couldn't take writing completely away from her. She compared it to 200 middle fingers that she'd hold up towards her depression every day by writing those 200 words. 😄 In addition, I have a page in my writer's journal where I wrote down why I write and what it is that I love about writing and creating stories. When I lack motivation, reading that page sometimes helps to remind me of what I love about writing, and to spark some motivation to get me going. I hope you feel better soon, and find a way to deal with it that feels good for you - I'm sure your inspiration will come back as soon as you feel better!
  11. I would have pronounced it Mee-as-mah - lucky strike by a none-native speaker, yay 😄 I can shed some light on this - it actually even makes a lot of sense when you're familiar with the old German alphabet. "ß" sounds like the "s" sound in English language (because German "s" sounds like English "z", and German "z" sounds more like "ts" - so those letters are already taken by other sounds). The "sharp" pronounciation (English "s") was written as the combination "sz" for a long time. In the old alphabet, "s" looked like "f" missing the horizontal stroke, and "z" looked a bit like "3", so "ß" is really just those two letters merged into one. It is even named exactly that - when spelling a word, "ß" is literally named "s-z".
  12. I have a pretty busy schedule right now, it'll take another week or two before there's a chance of me finding the time to check it...
  13. That's impressive! Out of curiosity: How many more manuscripts do you have left to transcribe?
  14. So, what do you guys think? What's the easiest way to handle this? Should we give those who wish to give more detailed feedback the option of doing so in a Google doc rather than in a public matter? Yes, absolutely. Reading a piece of writing and being able to add comments at the same time makes it much easier to give detailed feedback. With the current library system, line edits or feedback like "I like this sentence/how you worded this" is very hard to give, since we'd need to quote it first, which will make us jump to the review text field, and then scroll back and search for the part where we stopped reading in order to read on. In fact, it has stopped me from reviewing stories before. Should he be able to request feedback on all ten submissions at once, and make ten different posts requesting feedback? Or should we have a cap of, say, five submissions that he's allowed to ask for feedback for at once? I think that it's common sense not to spam the forum like that. It also depends on what kind of story someone is looking for feedback for - say member A posted 5 chapters or stories with 5k each, while member B is looking for feedback for 10 flash fiction pieces with 500 words each - member B is actually posting far less content than member A, but wouldn't be allowed to ask for feedback for all of them if there was a cap. I'd not put up any rules for that at the moment, they can still be added if it turns out to be necessary. Do you have any feedback for the rules for requesting feedback that you can think of and should be added? In the form it says "feedback" where it should say "critique" instead according to the definition you made at the beginning of the rules post. There's nothing I can think of that should be added at the moment.